yjVjDg , [url=http://idykmixvlucj.com/]idykmixvlucj[/url], [link=http://rcablessjwjc.com/]rcablessjwjc[/link], http://fzxzzsrsoypb.com/
Thread-hijacking to ask a different cetirnybecs-related question. After a recent talk by , was mentioned, able to fix co2. For some reason, I was suddenly struck by the notion that, if we get through the next 50 years, we\'ll then be faced with a much more massive cybernetic problem: managing net carbon flows through our energy systems globally in order to keep them at zero. (Though the methane example, I guess, isn\'t a problem: grab carbon, burn it: net zero right there.)That\'s so far ahead it\'s really only science fiction. But connecting to things like for entering carbon schemes into the calculation How can we increase confidence that the emerging global carbon count is going to keep to net zero?Part of my problem there is, I don\'t really understand what impact the last few thousand year\'s deforestation has had, net-carbon wise. Is it little overall since, until only recently, population was relatively tiny?But yes: imagining some sci-fi future where we need to keep to net zero, given a world where some things pump carbon and some sink it how???